A Glass of Sass

Edmonton: City of Who the Hell Are We?

Posted by on July 10, 2012 at 3:38 pm » 28 Comments

Identity crisis. Full on identity crisis. There is no other way to describe the current state of Edmonton, Alberta as it teeters on the edge of heading into the future as a modern, urban, culturally diverse city or slipping back into a past that depicts us as a redneck outpost, decorated in ripped and faded denim with a soundtrack of old Trooper hits to back up our image.

No event in recent history has depicted the identity crisis the City of Edmonton faces more glaringly than the debate over the renaming of Capital Ex, the city’s yearly midway monstrosity of a fair that has seen steadily declining attendance since it’s heyday of the late 70’s and early 80’s.

Originally known as “Klondike Days”, Edmonton’s annual exhibition has suffered greatly over the last 15 years. In an attempt to revitalize the fair and bring attendance back up to what it once was, the fair was renamed “Capital Ex”, supposedly to evoke a more inclusive and forward theme. The name change has failed miserably.

That’s not to say a name change wasn’t required. The truth of the matter is that although many long and lifetime Edmonton residents look back on Klondike Days through nostalgia colored glasses, the fair had nothing to do with the city Edmonton has become in the past two decades. Now more culturally diverse than ever before, and focused on presenting ourselves as a major economic and urban competitor both nationally and internationally, a fair theme based on a falsified history that was never Edmonton’s story is entirely out of place. It was time for a change, an image overhaul. It was time to rid ourselves of the mantle of a cliché of a theme that bore no relevance to who we are today. It was time to move forward.

It was time to retire Klondike Kate in the same manner we retired Miss Canada.

Who could’ve known that moving forward would result in an outcry that came forth from a collective who saw the changing of the annual fair’s name as a personal insult and affront? Who could’ve predicted that changing the title of an exhibition which had seen steadily declining attendance would result in those who weren’t attending the fair on a regular basis crying “foul” at the top of their lungs?

Only in Edmonton is letting go of an irrelevant past cause for so much ripping at one’s frilly Klondike style dress. Only in Edmonton is saying “this isn’t working anymore, the proof is in the numbers, it’s time for change” cause for so many people to take up verbal arms. Klondike Days wasn’t working anymore. The proof of that was in steadily declining numbers and overall interest in the annual event. And renaming the exhibition back to Klondike Days won’t solve the problem with what is now Capital Ex.

In fact, renaming it River City Days, or Get Loaded on the Midway Days, or This Was Once a Great Event Days or Pay Big Money to See A Washed Up 70’s Rock Band Days won’t help it either. It’s not the name that is the problem here. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet and a skunk weed by any other name is still a weed. If it were simply a matter of the name, it would’ve never been changed from Klondike Days to Capital Ex. If it were a matter of branding, Klondike Days would’ve continued to draw in the crowds.

Perhaps it’s time we considered that the issue is with the model of the exhibition itself – an outdated, overpriced, dirty and somewhat irrelevant fair in a city that has far more to offer in the way of festivals and events. Perhaps it’s about whether or not the annual fair is relevant anymore and examining that with the increase in the number of festivals this city is host to every year and the increasing success of those festivals, Capital Ex isn’t the only show in town anymore – which is exactly what Klondike Days was for a good many years: the ONLY show in town. Perhaps it’s about accepting that Capital Ex will never return to its previous glory days regardless of what we call it and we should be okay with that. We really should be. Because it’s a sign that we are more than we once were. It’s indicative of our cultural change and a plethora of other options for people to choose from.

Instead of arguing over yet another name change, wouldn’t it be wiser to accept the fair for what it is now, as opposed to forcing it to be what it was 20 years ago? Wouldn’t it be wiser to focus on marketing the fair to appeal to those who are interested in it as opposed to those who have no interest in the model and likely never will, no matter what less than well thought out name we slap on it? I can squeeze myself into a pair of leopard skin pants, tease my hair and overload on eyeliner – it won’t make me 25 again. It will make me a pathetic creature, attempting to hold on to my imagined glory days as opposed to accepting who I am today. It won’t result in an increased number of young men passing me their phone numbers as I stand in line at Tim Horton’s. It will result in a loss of my dignity and self respect, and attracting the wrong kind of attention. In other words: no matter what facade I put on, my “attendance numbers” are not going to skyrocket. I’ve changed, and for the better, I think. I accept that. And it’s time Edmonton accepts that we’ve changed.

But therein lies the crux. Because if there is one thing Edmonton continues to struggle with, it’s accepting what we are in this moment, and working towards becoming what we want to be in the future. For some reason this city holds on to the past – a past that benefits no one or nothing – with a death grip; screeching like a banshee when it’s finally ripped from our hands.

We are a City of Champions, in the truest sense. We champion great causes. We champion community involvement. We champion local business and downtown revitalization. We champion philanthropy. We champion a changed image from the redneck, backwoods, ultra conservative town we once were perceived to be.

Edmonton, it’s time we championed our own future and let go of the albatross of the past that does not adequately reflect who we are now, who we can be in the future. Because until we decide who and what we are, we cannot begin to tell the rest of the country, the rest of the world. And in our clinging to the relics of our past, the only message we send is that we are the same city we always have been. Is that the image we want to convey? Let’s get over our identity crisis.

Take off the leopard skin pants and the eyeliner, give ourselves a good long once over in the mirror and decide who we are now – not what we were in the past. And go with it.

  • http://twitter.com/digitalyssa Alyssa N

    I’m just re-iterating a comment I posted earlier today:

    The rodeo is what draws
    tourism to the Calgary Stampede. There is currently nothing about
    Capital Ex that would garner enough attention for major tourism to our
    city. The Edmonton Indy and the CFR are working on community engagement
    to create a city wide buzz like what the stampede does in Calgary. These
    are events that people would travel to attend and I think we should
    concentrate our efforts as such.

  • http://twitter.com/fatdavejohnston DaveDream Belieber

    Well, to be fair I believe it’s important to remember how & why this town was founded… but on the flip-side, to only acknowledge the history of Edmonton by naming a failing exhibition after it is a gross disservice as well.

    If people want to remember the Gold Rush then perhaps a classier and more educational method is in order… because when I think of K-days… I think of carnies. Not flattering imagery at all.

  • EG

    Toronto and Vancouver have really generic names for their yearly fair (Canadian National Exhibition, and Pacific National Exhibition, respectively). While I don’t suggest Edmonton go for something similar (Western National Exhibition, perhaps?), the current slate of finalists lack that ‘x’ factor that this festival sorely needs.It’s interesting to see this play out in Edmonton, in context to the Calgary Stampede’s 100th birthday. Calgary has clearly become THE modern, cosmopolitan city in the province. Yet, for 10 days everyone wears a cowboy hat, or some sort of western wear and celebrate where the city has gone, and what has been accomplished since then. Even the detractors who want Calgary to shed the western image still don a hat or bolo tie every July.

    Then again, the Stampede is really the ONLY big show in the summer in Calgary. Edmonton is fortunate to have other large festivals spread across the summer months.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    Although I may agree that Calgary Stampede is a brilliant example of branding and marketing, I disagree that it is their only show in town during the summer. My family, my friends and I travel to Calgary every summer without fail. Not for the Stampede, which bores me to tears, but to spend the weekend at the Calgary Folk Music Festival which rivals Edmonton’s not only in terms of the line up but in the environment and the location.
    Calgary has done a very good job of marketing their summer festivals as something other than what I like to refer to as “drunk in’s”. In comparison to our own folk fest, Calgary’s offers not only a far superior venue but a vastly more “family friendly” model. The beer garden, a mere fraction of the size of Edmonton’s, is dotted with huge, round tables equipped with real chairs that invite in families looking for respite from the heat. And families are truly welcome in the beer garden. That being said, in all the years I’ve been attending the CFMF, I’ve never seen a drunken brawl, never witnessed an out of hand 20 something making an ass of himself. Edmonton’s folk fest has become a big drunk party over the past few years. Every year the beer garden grows and the number of people who pay hundreds of dollars to do nothing but show up, line up at beer garden, get piss drunk and teeter out for the final act of the evening is shocking. In Calgary, that sort of behaviour simply doesn’t happen at the folk fest. And the level of enjoyment between the two festivals is obvious the moment one enters Prince’s Island for the CFMF.
    Part of our issue in Edmonton has always been our “work hard, play hard” attitude. Because our “play hard” translates into getting shit faced drunk. This is something that has become part of the fabric of Edmonton culture. And until we change THAT, we can’t begin to market or brand our city in a manner that will be beneficial.

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    And again, the fallacy of our involvement in the Gold Rush. We weren’t. Edmonton’s history was built upon the fur trade and Fort Edmonton – NOT on the gold rush. In fact, Edmonton was a seedy trading post at the start of the trail that very few visited for long. We were not a part of the gold rush. We were the drinking hole for those who didn’t find the gold they were looking for. Unfortunately, the K-Days myth has been adopted as our true history when it couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s akin to archaeologists years from now digging up Whyte Avenue and stating “Edmonton Alberta was apparently very much like the Jersey Shore.”

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://blog.mastermaq.ca Mack D. Male

    Well this is interesting. Usually it is said that Edmonton moves forward with almost reckless abandon! Clinging to the past? I’m not sure there’s a ton of evidence to support that notion.

    I do agree that renaming Capital EX to Klondike Days (or anything else, for that matter) is not going to make a lick of difference.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    Mack, I suppose it’s all relevant. To the forward thinking, we are a city that clings to ECCA, to Klondike Days, to our redneck conservative image. To those who think we are just fine as we are, we are a city that moves forward too quickly. Can’t please everyone – but stepping back into Klondike Days won’t resolve the issues with Capital Ex. And to be quite frank, I’m not really certain there is an issue with the fair that needs to be resolved. The issue is one of accepting it for what it is, not expecting it to be what it once was.

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://twitter.com/bingofuel Adam Rozenhart

    Hi Kikki,

    A great post, and I agree with the overall sentiment, certainly. But I don’t agree with some of your assertions.

    1. You refer to the Ex as something that “has seen steadily declining attendance since its heyday of the late 70s and early 80s.”

    According to the information I found on Mack’s blog, there hasn’t been a steady decline. It’s fluctuated pretty dramatically, certainly in the last 10 years (http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2009/07/27/attendance-numbers-for-edmontons-capital-ex/).

    2. I don’t think Edmonton struggles with “accepting what we are in this moment, and working towards becoming what we want to be in the future.”

    But I do think we’re really terrible at articulating what makes this place great. I feel like part of that is this weird fear that we might over-state the wonderful benefits of this city and be mocked for it. Gods forbid someone should evoke the word Deadmonton, right?

    Part of me thinks we need to care less about what people outside of the city think — whether those “outsiders” have experienced this place or not. We need to make Edmonton a place for Edmontonians — and realize that in so doing we WILL attract people to this city who share those values (I use the word “Edmontonians” in this case to mean not just people from the city and region, but people who identify with what it means to love and live in this place).

    Forget about CapitalEx, the Edmonton BRAND is dated. It’s based on bygone years, on tornados and hockey championships. But over the last five years, so much of this place has changed and grown.

    And we need to get good — not better, just GOOD (because we’re terrible at it right now) — at telling the story of this place.

    This issue is bigger than the name of an annual fair, but that does start to shine a light on the work we need to do. And there’s a lot of it, and it’s not going to be easy.

    Anyway, part of me wanted to be contrarian, and part of me wanted to make a few points. I hope you and your readers feel I’ve achieved my objectives. ;)

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    Adam, you bring up a point I spent hours discussing with others today: our branding and our complete and total failure in our attempts to do so.
    My interpretation of declining numbers is based in part on the fact that our population has doubled since the peak of K-Days. Given that our population has doubled, one would expect attendance at the Ex to double as well. As you’re aware, EFMF sells out every year, the EIFF has seen increasing attendance and Fringe has seen increased success. Capital Ex, on the other hand, hasn’t shown attendance numbers that would be indicative of a city that has experienced as much growth as Edmonton has.
    All of that being said, I do believe a large portion of the population is stuck in the past and the interest in changing Capital Ex back to K-Days is indicative of that. Yes, we have a growing youthful and diverse population, but we still have the older population who sees any forward movement as “bad”. We saw that during the ECCA hearings. We saw it during the ECCA debate.
    What I perceive right now is a city literally torn between the past and the future – and my concern is that changing back to K-Days or even the attempts to turn Capital Ex back into what it once was is to completely ignore that our city has changed drastically since K-Days was a big deal. Those big name rock bands that played K-Days aren’t coming back. The vibe K-Days had when I was a child is gone. Until we accept that and accept that it’s perfectly okay for this to have happened, that we don’t need to try to bring the fair back to what it was, we are failing both the city and the fair itself.
    Thanks for what you added. You’ve given me some things to “ponder”.

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://twitter.com/bingofuel Adam Rozenhart

    Thanks, K. You’ve given me fodder for a post I’m working on for tonight now. THANKS FOR ADDING MORE TO MY PLATE. :P

  • http://blog.mastermaq.ca Mack D. Male

    So that’s it? Capital EX will never be better than it is today? We should just accept that? I’m not satisfied with that, and I suspect the folks at Northlands aren’t either, which is probably why they think a new name will help.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    You shouldn’t be satisfied with that.

    There’s a vast difference between attempts to better the model and attempts to take it back to what it once was. I don’t see anything that suggests a focus on improving the model. I see slapping a new name on an event – and that won’t make the fair better. Can it be improved upon? Absolutely. But until focus changes from the name to the model, that won’t happen. And if we’re not willing to change the model, it’s time to cease with the angst over what we call the fair and accept it for what it currently is, whatever that may be.

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    Ha! Does this mean I’m your new muse? Because you have NO idea how much that would thrill me.
    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • Tess Gleason

    I grew up in Kelowna and Camrose neither of which are now defined by a single annual event anymore  - as in those centered around a carnival, an exhibition of agriculture, costume and a parade.  Those days,  as you mentioned, are gone along with the dark shades and the  ”i just wanna an excuse to get stoned in public” atmosphere of an 80′s rock concert.

    Edmonton should just move along and either reinvent the whole thing on a new level that’s more inclusive of the entire city (and not just Northlands) or drop it. 

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    Tess, I tend to agree. Klondike Days had an air of exclusivity about it – how much of our immigrant population, our new population is going to be interested in dressing up in old fashioned gear to walk a midway and eat mini donuts? On top of that, the event never changes. Year after year it’s the same rides, in the exact same set up, with the same midway food and games. The fair has not evolved. And that which doesn’t evolve becomes irrelevant. Just ask Donny Osmond ;-)

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://blog.mastermaq.ca Mack D. Male

    Well we’re agreed on that…it’s the model that needs to change!

  • Will Munsey

    The biggest, most vibrant
    city this far north on the planet. Trying to peg it down to one
    quantifiable festival name is just dumb. Edmonton and area defies a
    single definition. I hate it and I love it… sometimes at the same
    time and sometimes for the same reasons!

  • Pingback: Edmontonians are horrible storytellers | The Unknown Studio

  • Dresdin Archibald

    I think much of this desire to resurrect K-Days is based on nostalgia for one’s youth, not any real idea that it will improve the Ex. If anyone remembers, they changed the name from “Klondike Days” because the whole phony theme was just not working anymore. When was the last time that 1890s clothing was worn to work, on the avenues, etc.? You would have to go back to the 1970s. Edmonton simply had little to do with the Klondike gold rush. Let the good people of Whitehorse or Dawson City use the theme. THERE it’s real. (Remember how they resented us for stealing their theme?).

    The Chilkoot Mine and raft race were novel at one time. Now they are just hokey. Nothing ever changed or improved. Remember, the promenade used to cover many blocks downtown. As the years went by it got smaller and smaller. The theme just didn’t work anymore. If they go back to K-Days, they will be wanting to change it again in five years – tops. You mark my words.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    I couldn’t agree more. And that being said, I think anyone who understands the model realizes that it is this that needs to be changed – not the theme. As the city has evolved, Capital Ex has not. It’s a static event based on an outdated model of entertainment and lost in a sea of far better Edmonton venues and festivals. Until the model is changed, the exhibition will remain irrelevant. And changing the name prior to changing the model is a comedy of errors.

    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/laurie.thompson.39982 Laurie Thompson

    We have SO many festivals here – that’s why the Ex attendance is not all it could be. People only have so much expendable income and the Ex is virtually the same year after year, no matter what it is named.  I’m not saying that this is a bad thing, necessarily. I think that having SO many festivals here detracts from them ALL, not just the Ex.  And the Folk Fest seems to be just one more excuse to get drunk, in my observation, and I don’t care to go to it anymore.  Like it or not, the Klondike theme WORKED, period. We have a glut of every imaginable type of festival now and shouldn’t expect all to increase in numbers – it’s just not realistic.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    For the record, Captial Ex has long been renowned as Edmonton’s biggest drunk event. Furthermore, Klondike Days DIDN’T work. That is why the name was changed in the first place. And going back to Klondike Days won’t make the event anymore successful. While other festivals have experienced increasing growth and success with record breaking attendance yearly, Capital Wx has continued to disappoint. Back pedaling on the name won’t change that. It’s the very model of 1970′s style midway & agricultural fairs that must be reexamined, not the name.

  • http://www.kikkiplanet.com Kikki Planet

    The other aspect of Klondike Days that doesn’t work is that it’s a bit “exclusive”. It means nothing to our immigrant or new population and because it’s not based on our factual history we can’t even sell it to newcomers as a celebration of our beginning. It’s a ridiculous, outdated theme. But I’m willing to bet you dollars to donuts that K-Days received the most vote based on the reaction I’ve seen online.
    The fact remains that Northlands should have examined the fair as a whole, brought in a solid marketing team and decided upon a name AFTER they decided on a path. What they’ve done makes about as much sense to me as 16 year old girls who choose the names of their future children. It’s nonsensical. And it makes the fair even more irrelevant, if that’s at all possible. In an effort to regain the glory days of yesteryear, Northlands has fumbled the ball terribly.
    Kathleen Smith
    Founder & Publisher of KikkiPlanet.com
    kikki@kikkiplanet.com

  • http://twitter.com/dougmclean15 Doug McLean

    Kikki I certainly agree with most of your original post though I’m maybe not as harsh on Edmonton’s past. I think we actually have a lot to be proud of that’s led us to where we are today.

    I think my thoughts centre mostly around the subsequent comments that again to me demonstrate that we have a serious self-confidence issue in Edmonton. We are amazingly adept at outlining how everyone else’s festival or event or concert series is better than ours. We rarely give ourselves credit for the amazing things we do and have here. Please don’t confuse that with a lack of desire to improve – I just don’t think they have to be mutually exclusive. You can strive for better while appreciating the current.

    I think my point connects somewhat with what Adam said that we need to make the best Edmonton we can (yes, a bit corny sounds I know) for Edmontonians. The greater self-confidence we have, the more attractive we become outside, if that is truly something we’re concerned about.

    I just get tired of the notion that everything everywhere else is better. Calgary (or insert other favourite city here) does some great things which I admire but do I think Calgary’s a better or more ‘cosmopolitan’ city than Edmonton?  No, I simply don’t. It’s time we appreciate what we have here.

    Anyway, that goes well beyond your original post Kikki but just a few thoughts around this element of confidence that I think will go great lengths to make us the city we want to be.

  • http://twitter.com/journalistjeff Jeff Samsonow

    I agree with Adam’s sentiment that Edmonton just needs to embrace itself and get over trying to prove its something great to others. If we built the best city possible, for those that live here, you are naturally going to attract others. I don’t know the names of every festival or even in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, New York, or Paris, but I know them to be exciting, vibrant cities.

    As for Klondike Days, I’m with you and Mack (and I think Paula Simons wrote about this recently too). The name isn’t the (only) problem, it’s the event. With the ever-growing number of music festivals, the Fringe, attempts at winter fun with Ice on Whyte and other cold events, the exhibition needs to set itself apart, or be happy with a steady audience that doesn’t really grow.

    I will laugh quite a bit if this gets named K-Days. Not only would that be an attempt to appease this confusingly large number of Klondike fans, it would make things more ambiguous for newcomers to the city and tourists. What’s the K for?

    To Mack’s point on clinging to the past, I felt the same thing reading some of your comments. We might find folks clinging to some aspects of the past (or, more likely, things they thought were working or happened to work at one point) but we are also too quick to neglect and destroy physical pieces of our history and ignore history where it may play a role in our future.

  • Pingback: Starting an Edmonton experiment from scratch | Wildrose Meadowlark Constituency Association

  • Pingback: Parades, fairs and Klout | Edmonton Blog Watch | The Unknown Studio

  • Sylvia C.

    Kikki,

    Great thoughts. Three times I found myself whispering “huh, never thought of that before” under my breath.

    I wanted to come forward as someone who voted in favour of K-Days (if this is really honesty hour, and judging by my empty glass of redwine it’s precisely that o’clock…I wanted it to be Klondike Days). Before I tell you why, I want to say that I don’t disagree with any of the points you made. You certainly raise some valid questions and point out some areas that allow for huge improvement.

    When I was young, Klondike Days was the most amazing thing that happened in the summer. Every kid knew when Kdays was. You nagged your parents to take you constantly, and when you got old enough you might even get the drop off & roam.
    10 year old Sylvia had no idea why it was called Klondike Days, and truthfully I don’t think I cared. I think any effort to incorporate a history lesson into a midway would be like trying to learn algorithms while having sex. Klondike Days as a kid wasn’t about celebrating your city’s heritage. It was about dangerous rides. Lights. Freedom. Stuffed animals the size of your Aunt Lynn. Root beer. Hundreds of kids your own age. Do I need to go on?

    Kids will always love that shit. 30 years ago, and 30 years from now kids will never get tired of that combo. What has changed, and will continue to change is the adults. Maybe 40 years ago adults thougth dressing up in old time clothes and getting drunk of schnapps was a blast. And maybe 15 years ago we WERE a city of red necks, and getting drunk off cans of molson while listening to Creed on stage was our idea of a good night out. But well all know our city has evolved, and as you smartly pointed out our tastes have changed.

    My point is: adults were the ones voting for the names. And I think they might have voted that not because what it represents for Edmonton’s history & hertiage, but instead because it represents the last time they had fun at the midway. So instead of asking us what the new name should be, they should instead ask what we like to do for fun these days.